The most revealing fact about Syed Saddiq's 2026 has nothing to do with the Federal Court: in the Johor state election, MUDA contested four seats and lost all four, forfeiting its deposits in every one. Johor is his home state; Muar, his seat, sits inside it. The party he co-founded could not persuade enough voters in his own heartland to clear the eight-percent threshold. He was not on the campaign trail, having stepped aside so his trial would not become the party's albatross. That was defensible, arguably honourable, and also an accidental experiment. The result is brutal. Remove Syed Saddiq from MUDA and there is very little left that voters can identify. Analysts warned about this long before the wipeout: MUDA risked becoming a party built around an individual rather than a collective, and if the founder's prominence could not be replicated, its momentum would not survive contact with GE16. The party has done real work to answer that charge. Its 2026 internal election...
Dalam sejarah politik Malaysia moden, jarang ada tokoh yang bayang-bayangnya kekal begitu lama selepas meninggalkan Putrajaya berbanding Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. Bekas Perdana Menteri sebanyak dua kali itu masih menjadi watak sentral dalam setiap wacana politik negara namun bukan sebagai pemerhati semata-mata, tetapi pemain aktif yang terus mencorakkan dan lebih kerap menggugat kestabilan pentadbiran para penggantinya. Fenomena itu bukan sekadar anekdot politik. Situasi berkenaan menjadi corak pengulangan yang boleh dikesan sejak 2003, apabila Mahathir meletakkan jawatan buat kali pertama sehinggalah saat artikel ini ditulis pada pertengahan 2026. Persoalan yang wajar diajukan bukanlah sama ada Mahathir berhak menyuarakan pandangan sebagai seorang warganegara Malaysia dan bekas pemimpin. Persoalan yang lebih relevan adalah sejauh manakah kekerapa kritikan beliau terhadap para penggantinya telah menjejaskan kestabilan politik negara? Adakah kritikan itu mencerminkan keprihat...