When Mahathir Mohamad filed a police report accusing Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim of “sabotaging” Malaysia via a US trade agreement, the gesture felt less like a legal intervention and more like a return to a very specific kind of political theater. At its core, the report does not present evidence of a crime; it presents a political argument dressed up as one. Trade agreements are negotiated by governments the world over, involving a messy reality of trade-offs, compromises, and risks. They can be brilliant or flawed, but a disagreement over policy does not automatically amount to treason or a constitutional breach. If it did, every major treaty Malaysia has signed over the last four decades would warrant a criminal investigation. If there were a genuine belief that the Constitution had been violated or that Parliament was bypassed, the appropriate venues, the courts and the Dewan Rakyat, exist for precisely that purpose. By choosing a police report instead, the issue is intention...
Arena politik Malaysia digemparkan dengan krisis dalaman membabitkan gabungan Perikatan Nasional (PN) pada akhir tahun lalu. Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin meletakkan jawatan sebagai pengerusi gabungan tersebut berkuatkuasa 1 Januari lalu selepas berlaku kehilangan sokongan dalam kalangan ahli terhadap beliau. Krisis dalaman berkenaan semakin memuncak apabila berlaku konflik kepimpinan dalam kerajaan Perlis pada akhir tahun lalu. Bersatu berjaya mengekalkan jawatan Menteri Besar di Perlis tetapi PAS muncul sebagai kuasa dominan dalam gabungan terbabit. Presiden PAS, Tan Sri Abdul Hadi Awang mengesahkan bahawa Pengerusi PN seterusnya akan dicalonkan daripada kepimpinan parti itu, menandakan berlakunya peralihan kuasa yang jelas dalam PN. Konfilk tersebut sekali gus melemahkan PN menjelang Pilihan Raya Umum ke-16 (PRU-16) selain menimbulkan persoalan jelas tentang usaha penyatuan Melayu yang sering digembar-gemburkan. SUMBER: https://www.suarakeadilan.my/post/krisis-polit...