Skip to main content

Mahathir's Selective Memory Should Come With More Accountability

In the aftermath of the investigations against Tun Daim, former Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamad faces criticism and questions about his actions throughout his political career. In response to recent events, Mahathir has complained in the media, that he has been rewarded with “persecution” after both him and former finance minister Daim Zainuddin helped with Anwar’s re-election campaign during the Port Dickson by-election in 2018.

When Anwar contested in a seven-way fight in Port Dickson in 2018, Daim, who at the time chaired the Council of Eminent Persons, joined the former’s campaign and urged locals to support Anwar.

Asked if he thinks it’s a form of revenge or witch hunt conducted by the current government against him for the perception that Anwar was jailed and prosecuted under the nonagenarian’s first tenure as prime minister, Mahathir said he was unsure.

“I don’t know whether this is revenge.

“If I did something wrong, please investigate (me) but don’t use the government to threaten people,” he said.

However, the loss of his deposit in Langkawi and his various political failures after Langkah Sheraton, certainly raises doubts about his influence on Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's campaign trail in Port Dickson.

In fact, it can be appropriate to suggest that Mahathir's impact on Anwar's campaign is minimal, bringing to light potential irrelevance in Mahathir's current political standing – which makes it all the sadder considering the chaos that happen after Langkah Sheraton, let alone the narrative that he initially spread that he was the “victim” in the whole fiasco.

But let’s not lose focus, while Mahathir seems adept at portraying himself as a victim, the real concern lies in whether he, along with former finance minister Daim Zainuddin, may have been involved in financial improprieties. It has long been an open secret that Mahathir was extremely good at “rewarding his friends” and for many netizens, the Daim investigations is a culmination of long-growing calls of investigating their activities, emphasizing the principle that nobody should be above the law.

There is public skepticism, with concerns about the accountability of "big fish" like Daim and Mahathir within a system they once controlled. The notion that the prime minister enjoys virtual immunity from prosecution compared to former leaders raises questions about the fairness of the legal system but this should be ignored to ensure for the sake of finding the truth.

The urgency for an unbiased investigation into Mahathir and Daim's financial dealings is underscored, challenging the perception that they might escape accountability due to their past positions of power. The call for the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to expedite its investigations without fear or favor is paramount.

In response to Mahathir's accusations that investigations into him are a form of revenge, it highlights the need for accountability regardless of past support. The article rejects the notion that politicians should be immune from investigation if they receive support during elections, emphasizing the importance of upholding the rule of law.

As Mahathir attempts to deflect attention from potential investigations, it is warned against falling for his manipulative tactics. This is the perfect time for these investigations given Mahathir's diminished relevance.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mahathir: Antara Pragmatisme dan Prinsip

Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad merupakan individu tunggal yang menjadi Perdana Menteri negara ini sebanyak dua kali. Sepanjang kepimpinan beliau sebagai Perdana Menteri, Malaysia telah menyaksikan banyak perubahan dalam soal hubungan diplomatik dengan negara lain. Namun Mahathir kerap kali menggunakan kaedah yang berlainan daripada diplomasi konvensional sehingga mengundang kritikan terhadap diri beliau. Pemerhati politik mendakwa pendekatan diplomasi Mahathir lebih ke arah politik berbanding memperjuangkan prinsip. Dalam aspek dasar luar negara, prinsip dan nilai harus menjadi panduan. Negara perlu berdiri teguh kepada prinsip seperti keadilan, kedaulatan dan kebebasan. Mahathir bagaimanapun dalam beberapa keadaan, lebih cenderung ke arah pragmatisme berbanding berdiri teguh kepada prinsip. Sebagai contoh, Mahathir kerap kali mengkritik cara negara-negara lain mengendalikan pelbagai isu. Antaranya, Mahathir pernah mengkritik dasar luar Amerika Syarikat (AS) dan sokongan Britain terhadap AS ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Konflik Berkepentingan 'Hantui' Mahathir

Baru-baru ini, bekas Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad menegaskan tidak akan menghadiri siasatan Suruhanjaya Siasatan Diraja (RCI) berhubung kes Pulau Batu Puteh selepas mendakwa berlaku konflik berkepentingan berhubung pelantikan bekas Ketua Hakim Negara, Tun Md Raus Sharif. Peguam kepada Mahathir iaitu Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali mendakwa pelantikan Tun Md Raus akan mencemarkan keseluruhan prosiding RCI. Maka, Muhammad Rafique mewakili anak guamnya mahu kerajaan menggantikan Tun Md Raus sebagai Pengerusi RCI bagi memastikan keadilan buat Mahathir. Pada 2017, Mahathir memfailkan satu semakan kehakiman di Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur bagi mencabar keabsahan pelantikan Tun Md Raus sebagai hakim tambahan Mahkamah Persekutuan kerana Tun Md Raus Sharif telah mencapai usia 66 tahun dan enam bulan. Namun, Mahathir didakwa hanya memberi alasan dan sebaliknya mempunyai sejarah konflik berkepentingan sebelum ini ketika menjadi Perdana Menteri. Rujukan: https://www.sinarharian.com.my/arti...
Post a Comment
Read more

Politicians, It's Time To Be More Responsible On Race And Religion

March proved to be a tumultuous month for religious relations in Malaysia, as irresponsible parties attempted to rile up the Malay Muslim base in the holy month of Ramadan, ranging from the canteen for non-Muslims and, most recently, the Allah socks issue. Last week, images of the Miranosock socks bearing the word Allah sold at convenience store chain KK Mart's Bandar Sunway outlet went viral on social media. Following the revelation, KK Mart apologised to its customers and the Muslim community, in particular, for the oversight and stopped selling the product. The sock's supplier, Xin Jian Chang Sdn Bhd, had also apologised and said the products were part of a bulk of stocks purchased by mistake from its China-based supplier. Regardless of intent, this is a severe matter for Muslims, as the word "Allah" is revered in every sense of the word. Its careless printing of socks can be seen as an insult and has the potential to be used in an even more irresponsible manner. D...
Post a Comment
Read more