Skip to main content

Ilham Tower is Only the Tip of the Iceberg


In another salvo fired by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim in his pursuit for revenge, The multi-million-dollar Ilham Tower, a prime commercial building owned by the family of former finance minister Daim Zainuddin, has been seized by Malaysia’s anti-graft agency, sources say, in a sharp escalation to an ongoing probe into controversial transactions by corporate entities previously controlled by the one-time ruling United Malays National Organisation (UMNO).

We don’t really have to go back in time to see the questionable going-ons seen within Mahathir’s inner circle.

Take for example on August 29, 2018 the shares of Opcom, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of fiber optic cables and cable related products in Malaysia. rose 41.11% in a day. The reason? The Pakatan Harapan government had approved a RM 21.6b National Fiberization and Connectivity Plan.

There is no doubt that the fiberization of Malaysia is sorely needed – and the large amount of money that has been committed thus far is a clear sign that at least in Pakatan Harapan’s government, at least one Minister is doing his best to fulfill his portfolio.

This is not the first time that Opcom has had such good fortune, especially under a Mahathir-led government. Just four days after was sworn in as Prime Minister, Opcom Cables was awarded a RM11.16 million contract by Telekom Malaysia. Mokhzani is the chairman and CEO of this Opcom Cables at that time and his brother, Mukhriz (who is Opcom’s co-founder), was the largest shareholder until he turned his shares over to his wife before entering politics.

Fast forward to 2022, Opcom bags RM26m fibre optic infra contract from Celcom.

In a letter that went viral in 2018 by a Sebastian Loh, he warned that Mahathir’s cronyism is far worse than Najib’s corruption. I would argue that Najib’s corruption could have only existed if not for Mahathir.

After all it was opposition (now Mahathir ally) leader Lim Kit Siang who stated that, that it was during Mahathir’s 22-year tenure as prime minister that Malaysia first began to “rot”, thanks to corruption and rampant power abuse.

He pointed out that it was during Mahathir who had “single-handedly destroyed the independence, impartiality and professionalism not only of the judiciary, but also of other important national institutions like the police, the Election Commission, the anti-corruption agency, and the civil service”.

During Mahathir’s first tenure as prime minister, he had commissioned three main Umno officials to focus their attention to build “bumiputera capitalists”.

The three were Mahathir himself, Daim Zainuddin (who was finance minister during two phases of Mahathir’s term) and Anwar Ibrahim, who, before his downfall in September 1998, was second in power after Mahathir. All three had their respective corporate connections.

Their creations included the privatisation of public services included multi-billion projects such as the North-South Highway, water and sewerage, the Bakun dam, Light Rail Transit System and the National Train Service (KTM).

The benefits of these schemes evaded the average Malaysian – the only beneficiaries being companies that were linked to favoured. These companies were also often given bailouts and “preferred financing” when they invariably failed. One simply has to look at the sordid state of our infrastructure to see what at the compromised institutional design and regulatory enforcement of the Mahathir-era was given Malaysia.

Judging from recent developments, it was wishful thinking to even consider that Mahathir’s return to office would be anything different.

Some truths still remain - the closer and individual is to Mahathir, economic prosperity is almost sure to follow. It is no secret that Mahathir generously spreads the wealth around his close circle and friends. After all, companies linked to his family often secures GLC tenders, better financing, government bailouts and more.

Indeed his “stepsons”, Economic Affairs Minister Datuk Seri Azmin Ali and Youth Minister Syed Saddiq have been handsomely rewarded both in terms of position and in political security. After all, it was Mahathir who proved to be Azmin’s most powerful defender when the latter was confronted with a homosexual video scandal earlier this year. This is on top of his appointment in the Economic Ministry, which now oversees many of Malaysia’s most powerful GLCs (where Azmin also serves on their Boards of Directors).

Take a clean good look at how Youth Minister Syed Saddiq successfully lobbied for Gojek, a foreign company to operate in the country – despite statements by Transport Minister Anthony Loke that motorcycle ridesharing was unsuitable for the country. In fact, it seems that even in the aftermath of this announcement – Anthony Loke will still play second fiddle to Syed Saddiq, as it was later announced that the regulatory guidelines for motorcycle ride-sharing will be co-authored by the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Youth and Sports.

The greatest tragedy of all is that for the average Malaysia it is not the presence of corruption that is the problem – but it is the way that Mahathir uses corruption to advance his own agenda and expand his influence.

Let’s not kid ourselves, there can be no Malaysia Baru without a renewed commitment by Pakatan Harapan towards the ideals of egalitarianism and transparency. I fear so long that as long as Mahathir still remains: we may never see it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mahathir: Antara Pragmatisme dan Prinsip

Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad merupakan individu tunggal yang menjadi Perdana Menteri negara ini sebanyak dua kali. Sepanjang kepimpinan beliau sebagai Perdana Menteri, Malaysia telah menyaksikan banyak perubahan dalam soal hubungan diplomatik dengan negara lain. Namun Mahathir kerap kali menggunakan kaedah yang berlainan daripada diplomasi konvensional sehingga mengundang kritikan terhadap diri beliau. Pemerhati politik mendakwa pendekatan diplomasi Mahathir lebih ke arah politik berbanding memperjuangkan prinsip. Dalam aspek dasar luar negara, prinsip dan nilai harus menjadi panduan. Negara perlu berdiri teguh kepada prinsip seperti keadilan, kedaulatan dan kebebasan. Mahathir bagaimanapun dalam beberapa keadaan, lebih cenderung ke arah pragmatisme berbanding berdiri teguh kepada prinsip. Sebagai contoh, Mahathir kerap kali mengkritik cara negara-negara lain mengendalikan pelbagai isu. Antaranya, Mahathir pernah mengkritik dasar luar Amerika Syarikat (AS) dan sokongan Britain terhadap AS ...

Konflik Berkepentingan 'Hantui' Mahathir

Baru-baru ini, bekas Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad menegaskan tidak akan menghadiri siasatan Suruhanjaya Siasatan Diraja (RCI) berhubung kes Pulau Batu Puteh selepas mendakwa berlaku konflik berkepentingan berhubung pelantikan bekas Ketua Hakim Negara, Tun Md Raus Sharif. Peguam kepada Mahathir iaitu Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali mendakwa pelantikan Tun Md Raus akan mencemarkan keseluruhan prosiding RCI. Maka, Muhammad Rafique mewakili anak guamnya mahu kerajaan menggantikan Tun Md Raus sebagai Pengerusi RCI bagi memastikan keadilan buat Mahathir. Pada 2017, Mahathir memfailkan satu semakan kehakiman di Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur bagi mencabar keabsahan pelantikan Tun Md Raus sebagai hakim tambahan Mahkamah Persekutuan kerana Tun Md Raus Sharif telah mencapai usia 66 tahun dan enam bulan. Namun, Mahathir didakwa hanya memberi alasan dan sebaliknya mempunyai sejarah konflik berkepentingan sebelum ini ketika menjadi Perdana Menteri. Rujukan: https://www.sinarharian.com.my/arti...

Politicians, It's Time To Be More Responsible On Race And Religion

March proved to be a tumultuous month for religious relations in Malaysia, as irresponsible parties attempted to rile up the Malay Muslim base in the holy month of Ramadan, ranging from the canteen for non-Muslims and, most recently, the Allah socks issue. Last week, images of the Miranosock socks bearing the word Allah sold at convenience store chain KK Mart's Bandar Sunway outlet went viral on social media. Following the revelation, KK Mart apologised to its customers and the Muslim community, in particular, for the oversight and stopped selling the product. The sock's supplier, Xin Jian Chang Sdn Bhd, had also apologised and said the products were part of a bulk of stocks purchased by mistake from its China-based supplier. Regardless of intent, this is a severe matter for Muslims, as the word "Allah" is revered in every sense of the word. Its careless printing of socks can be seen as an insult and has the potential to be used in an even more irresponsible manner. D...