Skip to main content

It's Not Opcom's First Time

In what is the latest of a series of salvo in the never-ending Mahathir vs Anwar drama, PMX Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim brought attention to a fiber optic contract worth RM214 million awarded to a company that included members of Mahathir's family on its board. Anwar asserted that Mahathir had utilised his positions as prime minister and finance minister to grant the contract to Opcom Cables Sdn Bhd in 2003.

Most importantly, this approval was given before Mahathir's resignation as prime minister in late October 2003. During the Umno general assembly, Mahathir had publicly announced his intention to resign more than a year prior, in June 2022.

Anwar's defense statement further explained that on September 15, 2003, Telekom Malaysia Bhd (TM) sent a letter to the Ministry of Finance (MoF) requesting approval to engage in direct negotiations with Opcom for the supply of fibre optic cables valued at RM214.2 million. Anwar emphasised that TM is a government-linked company where the Minister of Finance Incorporated holds the golden share.

This, however, isn’t Opcom’s most recent controversy as on August 29 2018, after Pakatan Harapan’s historic victory, the shares of Opcom, a Malaysian company specialising in manufacturing and selling fibre optic cables and related products, experienced a significant 41.11% increase in value within a single day. This raised suspicions, particularly considering that the government had recently approved an RM21.6 billion National Fiberization and Connectivity Plan in the same period.

Quid-pro-quos in the Mahathir clan are often said as an open secret, with the long-running rumor that the net worth of Marina, Mirzan, Mukhriz and Mokhzani easily surpasses the GDP of at least 120 countries.

To be more specific: 

  1. Mokhzani owns 255 companies, with estimated total assets worth USD21 billion;
  2. Mirzan owns 156 companies, with estimated total assets worth USD17 billion;
  3. Mukhriz owns 128 companies, with estimated total assets worth USD13 billion; and
  4. Marina owns 52 companies, with estimated total assets worth USD 9 billion.

Now this will be openly denied by the Mahathir clan. Still, with the upcoming lawsuit and potential courtroom drama - there is a high chance that skeletons within the family’s closet may be open for public viewing.

Tun Mahathir can continue to attempt to take the “Malay” moral high ground to furnish his reputation in his waning years. Still, it was certainly a mistake for him to open himself to criticism like this.

Regardless of the outcome, we all can seek solace in the fact that if this case goes to court, it will send shockwaves throughout the public sphere and give Mahathir the reputation he deserves: the man who destroyed Malaysia.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mahathir, Stop Trying To Race Bait Us, We Know

The second day after the KKB by-election results coincided with the 55th anniversary of the 13 May 1969 race riots. It happened three days after the May 10 election of that year, the third after Malaysia’s independence on Aug 31, 1957. It has left an indelible mark on the Malaysian psyche—yet one of the few Malaysians left to have lived through that incident, a once powerful and well-regarded one, none other than Tun Mahathir, decided to declare on his social media accounts: The Malays have lost their way. If they voted for a non-Malay in Kuala Kubu Bharu, why not a non-Malay PM? Thankfully, Malaysians of all stripes thoroughly rejected this, with many mocking the old nonagenarian for continuing to put himself in the public eye despite his recent legacy marred by political miscalculation and betrayals of the people’s mandate. For most Malaysians, the incident is nothing but a near myth - only discussed in whispers and anonymous corners of the internet. Yet the consequences of that sord...

Pulau Batu Puteh Revisited in 2024

The 2024 Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) report on Batu Puteh has blown the lid off the ineptitude, neglect, and possible deliberate political machinations that led to Malaysia losing Batu Puteh to Singapore in 2008. The RCI has painted a damning picture of Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s leadership during both his first tenure and his second stint as Prime Minister, highlighting not just a failure to act but an active sabotage of Malaysia's territorial integrity. The commission’s findings strongly suggest that Mahathir’s administration mishandled the legal defense of Batu Puteh to such an extent that it can only be seen as a catastrophic misstep—one that may have been caused by incompetence, poor legal advice, or even deliberate negligence. The 2008 ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which awarded Batu Puteh to Singapore, remains a national sore that Mahathir, despite his protests, cannot escape. The RCI goes further, accusing Mahathir’s government of missing key opportun...

Kes Syed Saddiq Sebagai Contoh Pengajaran

Ahli Parlimen Muar, Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman baru-baru ini mendakwa hukuman tujuh tahun penjara dan dua sebatan dikenakan terhadapnya adalah melampau. Syed Saddiq mendakwa Hakim bicara, Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid terkhilaf dari segi undang-undang apabila mensabitkannya atas empat kes subahat pecah amanah, salah guna harta dan pengubahan wang berkaitan dana Angkatan Bersatu Anak Muda (Armada). Beliau mendakwa hukuman terbabit tidak mengikut prinsip-prinsip hukuman yang boleh diterima. Melihat kepada pelbagai alasan yang diberikan oleh Syed Saddiq, seolah-olah beliau mempertikaikan 'kerja' badan undang-undang dalam mensabitkan kesalahan kepada pesalah. SUMBER: https://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/syed-saddiq-dipenjara-7-tahun-sebatan-denda-rm10-juta-445336 Dakwaan bahawa hukuman terhadapnya adalah 'melampau' bukan sahaja memperlihatkan kelemahan Syed Saddiq dalam menerima tanggungjawab, tetapi juga menimbulkan keraguan terhadap komitmennya kepada prinsip keadilan...